An evaluation of the Khost Commission on Conflict Mediation (CCM)

The purpose of this evaluation is to critically examine the factors that have lead to the success of the CCM, while at the same time identify challenges that need to be addressed. In order to ensure that the CCM remains a legitimate, effective, and sustainable conflict resolution body in the southeast.

Two and a half years ‘after its inception, the experience of the Khost Commission on Conflict Mediation (CCM) demonstrates that, far from being antagonistic, government and traditional justice systems can be mutually reinforcing’ (TLO 2008a, 5). The CCM so far has successfully resolved 23 disputes, some extremely protracted, dealt with emerging conflicts, and deescalated active conflicts by brokering cease-fires; all under government supervision and approval.